On the Office of the Spiritual Master (Shaykh) and Being a Disciple (Murid)
Chapter 5 of the Book of Ad-Dahab al-Ibriz min Kalam Sayyidi Abdelaziz Dabbagh (The Pure Gold in the Sayings of Sidi Abdellaziz Dabbagh) by al-Faqih Sidi Ahmed Ibn al-Moubarak al-Lamti Sijilmasi
Translated by John O'Kane and Bernd Radtke
Shrine of al-Qutb Sidi Abdellaziz Dabbagh al-Fasi, Bab al-Futuh, Fez
One
of the jurists asked him—God be pleased with him— whether what's been
said is true or not, namely that the training of disciples has ceased.
The
text of the question is: 'Our lord and imam, you whom God has given the
illumination He confers on His noble Friends and has honored by family ties with
the house of prophethood— the most excellent blessings and purest peace be
upon him who possesses prophethood
—teach us—for Cod has taught you from His divinely communicated
knowledge—that which, by elucidation of direct speech as well as similitudes,
removes incomprehension from men's hearts and frees their minds from fetters, so
that they come to acquire the spiritual sciences. For it's reported that the
Prophet said-—blessings and peace be upon him: "Mankind is God's family,
and the dearest of mankind unto God are those who most benefit His family."
One
of the questions, oh Sayyidi, concerns what's transmitted from the Shaykh
Zarruq—God be pleased with him: “Training
disciples in the strict sense (bi al-istila’h) has ceased. All that
remains is training by means of [a shaykh's] effective will (himma) and
spiritual state (‘hal). So give your attention to the Book and the
Sunna without any additions and omissions.” Was this peculiar to his own day
and age or has training disciples ceased until the descent of our lord Jesus (at
the end of time)—peace be upon him—? And if you say it's ceased, what caused
it to cease? And if you say it still remains, then who is the shaykh to whom the
spirit of the novice (murid) should be entrusted, and who should exercise
authority over it through spiritual retreat (khalwa) or whatever he
wishes? Specify for us in what clime and what country the person is found at
whose hand one of God's slaves (‘ibad) may attain success.
The
Shaykh answered'—God be pleased with him.
"The
purpose of training is to purify the body (ad-dhat) and cleanse it of its
vanities so it becomes capable of carrying the secret. This can only be done by
removing darkness from the body, severing from its orientation attachments of
falsehood and then severing from it falsehood (itself). Sometimes this occurs
due to the purity in its fundamental nature, God having cleansed it without an
intermediary. Such was the situation of the three noble generations that were
the best of generations. People in those generations were engaged with the truth
and sought after it. If they slept, they slept in the truth. If they were awake,
they were awake in the truth. And if they set themselves in motion, their motion
was in the truth. Thus anyone whose deeper vision God had illuminated and who
then looked at their interiors would find that their minds—with rare
exception—were engaged with God and His Apostle and sought to attain whatever
is pleasing to God and the Apostle. For this reason there was much good in them.
The light of truth shone in their bodies, and religious science (‘ilm)
and the attainment of a degree of independent juridical interpretation (ijtihad)
appeared among them that can't be described or supported. Consequently,
spiritual training wasn't necessary in those generations. The shaykh met his
novice who was to be the possessor of his secret and the heir to his light, and
he [simply] spoke in his car and by this means alone the novice received
illumination because of the purity of bodies, the clarity of minds and because
of the novice's longing for upright behavior.
But
sometimes this occurs—I mean the separation of darkness from bodies—through
the shaykh bringing it about, and this is after the noble generations when
intentions have been corrupted and inner convictions have become dulled. Minds
axe then engaged with the world, seeking to attain fulfillment of lusts and the
enjoyment of pleasures. The shaykh, endowed with deeper vision, now meets his
novice and heir, he recognizes him and looks him over. He finds that the
novice's reason is engaged with falsehood and the fulfillment of lusts, and he
finds his body follows his reason in this. It amuses itself with those who
pursue trivial amusement, it's neglectful with those who are neglectful, and it
sides with the worthless. In the midst of this the limbs set themselves in
motion in uncommendable actions because the mind which is the body's master is
attached to falsehood, not to the truth. Thus if he finds toe novice in this
state, he orders him to undertake spiritual retreat (khalwa),
recollection of God (dhikr), and to diminish his food. In
spiritual retreat he's separated from the worthless who are among the number of
the dead. Through recollection of God false speech disappears along with trivial
play and foolishness which were on his tongue. And through diminishing food the
vapors in the blood diminish as does lust, and the mind returns to being engaged
with Cod and His Apostle. If the novice then attains this cleanliness and
purity, his body is able to support carrying the secret. And this is what
shaykhs aim for in their training and by imposing spiritual retreat.
And
so matters stood for a while, until truth consorted with the false and light
consorted with darkness. The people of falsehood now trained whoever came to
them, having them enter spiritual retreat and imparting God's names with a
corrupt intention and a purpose contrary to the truth. Moreover, they might add
magic incantations and such usages that provoke God the Sublime's deceit
(makr) and forms of lulling someone into false contentment (istidrajat).
This state of affairs was widespread in the eras when the shaykh Zarruq—God
be pleased with him—and his spiritual masters lived. Thus it appeared to them
to be good advice regarding God and His Apostle to tell the people to withdraw
from this kind of training in which the idle were numerous- They had the people
stand in the courtyard of safety which is devoid of fear and sorrow, namely
adherence to the Sunna and the Book which don't lead astray anyone who takes
(54) them as his guide. The words of these masters—God be pleased with
them—were uttered by way of advice and caution. It wasn't their wish—God be
pleased with them—to eliminate altogether the true training. Far be it from
them! Indeed, the light of the Prophet (peace and blessing be upon him) still
remains and its goodness is all-embracing and its blessing will prevail until
the Day of Resurrection.
As
for your words: "Who is the shaykh?", the answer for you is:
The shaykh accorded leadership is someone who knows the Prophet's states (peace
and blessing be upon him) and whose body has been given the Prophet's light to
drink so that he's come to follow the Prophet's steps (peace and blessing be
upon him). God the Sublime has provided him with perfect faith and purity of
divine knowledge (‘irfan). So this is the one accorded leadership. You
must love him and associating with him will bring profit. Indeed, he joins the
slave (‘abd) with his Lord and removes from him doubts about his
knowledge of God and causes him to advance in his love of the Prophet (peace and
blessing be upon him)!
As
for your words: "Specify for us in what clime and what country he's to
be found", the answer for you is: Praise be to God—there are numerous
persons of such description in [different] countries and among the slaves (‘ibad).
And don't look for him outside the people of (be Sunna and the Community. Seek
him and you'll find him! "God is with those who are godfearing and those
who do good" (Quran 16:128).'
The
same jurist also questioned him about the shaykh who lays claim to seeing the
Prophet (peace and blessing be upon him). The
wording of the text goes: “Oh Sayyidi, one of them”, i.e. one of the
questions, “is that when it comes to someone who claims to see the Prophet in
a waking state (peace and blessing be upon him)—the knowers of God say his
claim is only to be accepted on the basis of proof. That is to say, he's
traversed all but one of three thousand halting-stations.
Therefore it's incumbent on whoever makes this claim to explain these
halting-stations afterwards. What I seek from your Eminence—God perpetuate
it—is that you enumerate the halting-stations for us. Even if [only] by means
of a symbol and summarily or whatever is possible of them—and not at great
length.'
He
answered—God be pleased with him:
'In
the interior of everybody there are three hundred and sixty-six (366) veins,
each vein bearing its own special attribute with which it was created.
The knower of God endowed with deeper vision beholds these veins shining and
aflame in their various characteristics. Lying has a vein set aflame by its own
attribute, envy has a vein that shines by means of its attribute and hypocrisy
has a vein that shines by means of its attribute, betrayal has a vein mat shines
by means of its attribute, conceit has a vein that shines by means of its
attribute, and pride has a vein that shines by means of its attribute, and so it
continues until you cover all the veins. Thus if the knower of God looks at
bodies, he sees each body like a lantern with three hundred and sixty-six
candies fixed in it. Each candle has its own quality which isn't like any other
candle. Moreover, each one of these attributes has subdivisions and categories
in it. Desire, for instance, has categories depending on what it's focused on.
If it's focused on the genitals, this is one category. If it's focused on tank,
this is another category and if on money, this is another category and if on
hope that time remains [to repent], still another category. And the same is true
of lying because if someone with this attribute doesn't tell the truth, it's
considered one category. If someone with this attribute thinks another person
isn't telling the truth and doubts his words and doesn't believe him, this is
considered another category.
The
slave (‘abd) doesn't receive illumination until he's traversed all
these stations.
But if God wishes His slave well and renders him fit for illumination. He
gradually eliminates them from him one after the other. If, for example, God
eliminates from him the attribute of lying, the slave reaches the station of
truthfulness and then the station of confirming the truth. If God eliminates the
attribute of desire for wealth, he reaches the station of asceticism, and if the
desire for sins, be reaches the station of repentance, or if the desire for hope
that time remains [to repent], be reaches the station of aversion to the House
of deception (the world), and so on.
Then
if he receives illumination and the secret is placed in his body, he advances by stages in
the stations of beholding (mushahada) the worlds. The first
thing he beholds are the earthen bodies, next the translunar bodies
and then the bodies of light. Then he beholds God the Sublime's
actions as pervading His creation. In his beholding the earthen bodies there
are stages. The first thing he beholds is the earth that he's on. Next he
beholds the oceans that are on the earth. Then be beholds what's
between the earth he's on and the second earth, because his sight penetrates
the boundaries up to the second earth. Then he beholds the second earth,
next he penetrates the boundaries up to the third earth. And so it
proceeds until the seventh earth. He then beholds the air between
himself and the first heaven, next the first heaven itself. And so it
proceeds as in the previous manner with the earth. Then he beholds Barzakh
and the spirits that are in it, then the angels and the guardian angels,
and the affairs of the hereafter.
In
the case of each of these visions (mushahadat) the slave (‘abd)
is subject to a rightful claim from among the rightful claims of Lordliness (rububiyya)
and a proper role of behavior from among the rules of being God's slave (‘abd)
(‘ubudiya). In this barriers appear to him and he experiences
hindrances. He beholds frightful and deadly things. If it weren't for God the
Sublime conferring success and His generosity toward the impotent slave and His
mercy on him, the slave would return from the least of these stages rendered
feeble-minded because of them.
His
traversing the stations of vision (mushahadat) and their terrors
is more difficult for him than the stations of the attributes of carnal
souls, because his traversing the stations of attributes was internal and he
didn't know about it until after illumination. But his traversing the stations
of vision is external.
He
beholds it directly and sees it because it's something be delves into after
illumination. If his gaze is pure and the light of his deeper vision is
complete, and if God shows him such mercy that after it no hardship exists, then
God—He is exalted—will bestow on him sight of the chief of the first and the
last [of mankind]— upon him be the best of blessings and the purest peace!
He'll see him directly and behold him in a waking state. God the Sublime imparts
to him what no eye has seen, no ear has heard, and what has never occurred in
any human being's heart. He now attains the station of well-being and happiness.
May he take delight in this felicity!
If
you consider the above-mentioned number of attributes and the categories
contained in them along with the stations occurring in the previous visions,
you'll find that they exceed the aforementioned number. Moreover, the pure
qualities of the Prophet (peace and blessing be upon him) aren't concealed from
his religious community. The religious scholars-God be pleased with them—have
recorded what God—He is blessed and sublime—distinguished him with in his
body's exterior and in its interior—the most excellent blessings and purest
peace be upon him! Whoever claims to
have seen him in a waking state, let him be questioned about some of the
Prophet's pure states and let his answer be heard.
It won't be unclear which person answers on the basis of direct vision,
nor will he be confused with anyone else. Peace!
Now
if you're satisfied with this, be happy with it! But if you wish to hear more,
know that if God the Sublime confers illumination on die slave (‘abd),
He provides him with a light from the lights of truth which enters his body from
all directions. It penetrates the body until it’s penetrated flesh and bone. From
its cold and the hardship of its entering the body the slave) suffers what
approximates the agonies of death. It's characteristic of this light that it
imparts secrets of created beings through the beholding of which God wishes to
bestow illumination on this slave. And the light enters the body, being
variously colored with the colors of the said created beings. So if,
for example, God the Sublime wishes to bestow illumination on him through
beholding created beings on the surface of this earth, then the light in
question comes to him one time and it penetrates him with the secrets by means
of which the bodies of the offspring of Adam were formed. Another time it
comes to him with the secrets by means of which animals were formed. And
another time it comes to him with the secrets by means of which inanimate things such as fruits, vegetables,
etc., were formed. But he won't receive illumination through beholding any
of them until he's first given to drink of their secrets. However, on
each occasion he suffers what he suffered the first time.
And
among the created beings is the chief of existence and the luminary of direct
witnessing—peace
and blessing be upon him! But if God promises the slave (‘abd) to
bestow on him illumination through beholding the Prophet's noble body (peace and
blessing be upon him) be won't behold him until he's been given to drink the
secrets which the Prophet's noble body contains.
Let's
suppose that the body before illumination is like something dark and that the
noble body [of the Prophet] is like a light with various rays that number one
hundred thousand or more. If God wishes to be merciful to this dark body, the
light that assists it and provides it with drink comes to it one time. It
penetrates it with these rays one after me other. Let's suppose, for example,
the ray of patience. By means of it the blackness of its opposite, consisting of
fear and anxiety, disappears. Another time the light comes to it with a
different ray. Let's suppose it's the ray of mercy. Then the blackness of its
opposite, which is a lack of mercy, disappears. And another time it comes to it
with a different ray. Let's suppose the ray of forbearance. By means of it the
blackness of its opposite disappears. And so it continues until you go through
all the rays that are contained in the Prophet's pure, illuminated body. Then
all the characteristics associated with black bile disappear from the dark body.
At this point the slave (‘abd) is capable of beholding the [Prophet's]
noble body because as long as some blackness remains with him, blackness is in
his body, and he's unable to behold the noble body until all blackness leaves
his body.
But
we don't mean that if he's given to drink the secrets that are in the noble body
that he contains them to the perfect degree they have in the Prophet's noble
body. Rather we mean he's given to drink the secrets to the extent that his body
and his fundamental nature can support. Nor do we mean that if he's given to
drink some of these rays mat they diminish in the noble body and their place
remains empty of them. Indeed, the lights don't disappear from their place by
someone partaking of them.
Thus
it's become clear to you that the slave (‘abd) doesn't behold the
Prophet (peace and blessing be upon him) until all his characteristics are
effaced by the arrival of these noble secrets and subtle lights. And this
involves traversing stations that can't be counted and are beyond any reckoning.
The
excellence of God's Apostle admits no limit.
That can be expressed by speech of the mouth.
It's
as if whoever limited them to two thousand or more was reporting on his own
situation and the illumination he'd received. He still lacks what he lacks. As
for what was previously said about denying vision (mushahada) to the
person who hasn't been given all the lights to drink—what we meant by this was
denial of perfect vision. Whoever still lacks a ray of light but experiences a
vision hasn't experienced it with perfection. But God knows best!”
And
the said jurist questioned him about the novice (murid) who increases if
the shaykh is present and becomes less if the shaykh is absent. The wording of
the text goes: “Oh Sayyidi, one of them', i.e. one of the questions, 'is that
if the novice associates with the perfect shaykh who's a knower of his Lord and
the novice claims the shaykh trains him through his effective will (himma)
and yet should the human physicality of the shaykh be absent due to death or
travel, the novice feels a weakness in himself as far as his spiritual state,
religious knowledge and action—then what's the meaning of the shaykh's
training him through his spiritual state and effective will and the novice's
deriving benefit from him, given that his benefit from the shaykh grows weak
once the shaykh is distant from him?”
He
answered—God be pleased with him:
The
perfect shaykh's effective will (himmat Shaykh al-Kamil) is the light of
his faith in God—He is mighty and glorious! By means of it he trains the
novice and causes him to advance from one situation to another. If the novice's
love of the shaykh comes from the light of his own faith, the shaykh assists
him whether he's present or absent, nay even if he's died and a
thousand years have elapsed. This is why the Friends of God of every
age receive assistance from the faith of the Prophet (peace and blessing be upon
him) and he trains them and causes them to advance—the most excellent
blessings and purest peace be upon him—because their love of him is a pure,
unadulterated love which comes from their own faith.
On
the other hand, if the novice's love of the shaykh comes from the novice's
body and not from his faith, he has benefit from it as long as the shaykh is
present. But then if one body is absent from another body,
severance takes place. The sign of the body's love is that his love of the
shaykh is for the sake of benefit or to ward off harm in this world or in the
world to come. And the sign of love based on faith is that it's solely for the
sake of God's face, and not for any other purpose. If the novice experiences a
decrease in himself during the shaykh's absence, the fault lies with the novice, not with the shaykh. But
God knows best!”
And the said jurist also questioned him about whether the path of
thankfulness (shukr) or the path of ascetic struggle (mujahada) is more worthy. This is the wording of the text: 'And another
question, oh Sayyidi—God be pleased with you and give you contentment—concerns the
difference between the path of the Friend and knower of God, al-Shadhili, and his followers on the one hand, and the path of al-Ghazali—God the Sublime be pleased with him—and his followers, on the
other hand. As for the first path, it revolves entirely around thankfulness and
joy in the divine Benefactor without hardship and trouble. As for the other
path, it revolves around self-mortification (riyada), fatigue, hardship, sleeplessness, hunger, and suchlike. So, oh Sayyidi, are the two not in agreement about self-mortification? And then
does al-Shadhili order gratitude after one has come close to reaching God or when
reaching Him, or does he order gratitude and joy in God from the first instant
and the outset? [Finally,] is it possible for one man to travel both these paths
or is it impossible to benefit from the one without turning away from the other.
Give [us] a clear answer!'
He answered—God be pleased with him:
'The path of
thankfulness is the original path, the one adhered to by the hearts of the
prophets, the elect Companions and others as well. It entails worship of God the
Sublime with sincerity in being God's bondsman (‘ubudiya) and disavowal of all allotments in acknowledgement of impotence,
shortcoming, and failure to fulfill the rightful claim of Lordliness (rububiya), while this [attitude] remains constant in the heart during the
passage of hours and periods of time. When God—He is blessed and
exalted—knew their truthfulness in this, He rewarded them with what
His generosity requires in the way of illumination regarding knowledge of Him
and attainment of the secrets of belief in Him—He is mighty and glorious! When
the adherents of self-mortification heard about the illumination these people
received, they made this the object of their own seeking and desire. They sought
after it by means of fasting, rising [at night], sleeplessness and continuous
spiritual retreat, until they came to attain what they attained.
And
from the start emigration (hijra) on the path of thankfulness was to God
and to His Apostle, not to illumination and the acquisition of spiritual ranks.
Emigration on the path of self-mortification, however, was aimed at illumination
and the acquisition of spiritual ranks. Journeying on the first path is a
journey of hearts, while on the second path it's a journey of bodies. And
illumination on the first path is a sudden onslaught that the slave (‘abd)
hadn't been desiring. While the slaves (‘ibad) was in the station of
seeking repentance and forgiveness of sins, behold clear illumination came over
him.
Both
paths are correct but the path of thankfulness is more correct and more sincere.
Both paths are in agreement about self-mortification but in die first there is
self-mortification of hearts by means of their attachment to God—He is mighty
and glorious— and their compulsory devotion to His door and taking refuge with
God in what one does and omits to do, and avoiding the forgetfulness that occurs
in between one's occasions of spiritual presence (‘hudur). In short,
self-mortification consists of attaching one's heart to God—He is sublime and
exalted—and perseverance in this, even if the exterior isn't involved with
immense worship. Therefore the one who adopts it fasts and breaks his fast,
rises [at night] and sleeps, is intimate with women, and undertakes all the
stipulations of the law contrary to mortification of the flesh.”
And
another time, after having said: 'Emigration on the path of self-mortification
was aimed at illumination and the acquisition of spiritual ranks (nayl
al-maratib)', he added:
'After illumination there's the person who remains with his first
intention. His heart is concerned with the things he beholds in the worlds and
he delights in the unveiling he experiences, walking on water, covering great
distances in one step, and this he considers to be the goal. Such a person is one of those whose hearts were empty
of God—He is mighty and glorious—at the outset as well as in the end. He's
one of: "...the greatest losers in their works whose striving goes
astray in the present world, while they think they're doing good deeds"
(Quran 18:103).
And among them is
someone whose intention changes after illumination. God the Sublime shows him
mercy and takes him by the hand. His heart then attaches itself to God—He is
sublime and exalted—and he turns away from anything other than God. The
situation that occurred for this person after illumination was the starting
point for the path of thankfulness. But what a distance there is between these
two paths! What a difference between their goals!
In short,
journeying on the first path is a journey of hearts and on the second a journey
of bodies. The intention on the first path is pure, while on the second it's
adulterated. The illumination on the first path is a sudden onslaught that the
bondsman hadn't desired and it's divine, while on the second it's acquired by a
stratagem and a means. Thus illumination is divided into these two kinds. The
illumination on the first path is only acquired by a believer who's an intimate
and beloved knower of God, in contrast to that of the second path. Indeed,
you've heard that [Christian or Buddhist] monks and rabbis of the Jews practice
forms of self-mortification by means of which they attain certain results that
lure them to destruction (istidrajat). »
He said—God be
pleased with him:
'In what we have
to say here we're speaking about self-mortification in general, whether it be
authentic or false. We aren't speaking about the self-mortification of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali in particular—God be pleased with him! Verily, he was an imam of
truth and a Friend of God with sincerity.
As for the question: "And is it possible for one man to travel
both these paths?", the answer is that it's possible, for no contradiction
exists between the two. It's possible for a person to attach his heart to
God—He is mighty and glorious—with regard to everything he does and omits to
do, while he engages his exterior in forms of ascetic struggle and
self-mortification. But God the Sublime knows best!'
And
the same jurist questioned him further. The wording of the text goes: 'And
another question, oh Sayyidi, concerns whether it's possible for a human being
to know his capacity (qabiliya) for being a novice or his lack thereof? I
mean his particular capacity (qabiliya).Or can this only be made known to
him by someone else, an upright shaykh or a brother who gives sincere advice?”
He
answered—Cod be pleased with him:
“A
person can know by himself what his capacity is by observing the dominant
element in his thought (fikr). The latter is what his body has been
created for, and it's necessary for the body to follow what his thought is
engaged in, whether his body was established in it from the beginning or not.
Anyone whose thought is dominated by love of God and an inclination for Him,
awareness of His awesome power, and fear before His splendor and majesty—this
is the sign that God wishes that person well, whether his body was established
in offenses (al-mukhalafat) or in acts of conformity (al-muwafaqat).
Even if it was established in offenses, God the Sublime will see that it returns
to goodness, well-being, upright behavior and success. Moreover, the said
capacity is like manliness and bravery which differ in intensity and weakness,
and you can recognize its different degrees. Whoever looks at a group of boys
playing recognizes which one's manliness is strong and which one's manliness is
weak, and which one's manliness is intermediate. It's this way with the people
of capacity. They differ with regard to the presence of the kind of thought just
referred to. Among them is someone who's on a high level because that thought is
dominant in him at all times, and there's someone to whom it only comes on rare
occasions, and then there's someone in the middle.
The
secret behind this is that the thought and the ideas (khawatir) that
occur in the interior are a light from the lights of reason (‘aql)
which the reason imparts to the body in accordance with the divine decree and
what destiny has predetermined. If good has been intended for the body, reason
casts into it the thought for good and its causes, so that use body attains it
If evil has been intended for the body, reason casts into it the thought for
evil and its causes, so that the body reaches it and obtains it.
Similarly,
the good follows the three previously mentioned degrees of thought, and evil as
well follows the decrees of thought concerning it. Moreover, capacity isn't
conferred by what's been predetermined. Rather capacity simply appears in
everything the divine decree predetermined that the body would attain and reach.
Now
whoever looks at a group of boys and it's been predetermined that one of them
will be a scribe and another will be a bleeder and another will be a policeman,
for example—the first knows now to wield a pen for writing and he acquires
this with the least instruction. He doesn't know how to wield a razor to give
relief [by bleeding someone] and be doesn't know how to wield a knife.
And
if he were instructed, what good would it do? And the second knows bow to wield
a razor but doesn't know how to wield a pen and a knife. And the third knows bow
to attach a knife but doesn't know bow to wield a pen and a razor. '"Everyone
is given help with what he was created for." (Hadith) It's the same for
someone whose dominant thought is commerce in cloth and suchlike and yet has
rather wants to set him up him in agriculture. No good comes from him. But were
his father to set him up in commerce, what he accomplished would satisfy and
please his father. What this indicates is that capacity for every matter is
based on thought about it Everyone has understanding of whatever his thought is
occupied with. But God alone gives success!'
I.
al-Lamati, would add that I heard the following from the Shaykh—God be pleased
with him:
'A
woman who lived in by-gone days had two sons and a daughter. When she was on the
point of dying, she said to those [with her): "My son So-and-so will become
one of the godly men and the other son will be one of the wicked. The girl will
come to have much wealth and abundant worldly goods," She was asked:
"Do you know the Unseen?" She replied: "I don't know the Unseen
but I looked at the first son and I saw that he's filled with fear of God the
Sublime. He does nothing unjust to any of the boys. His Lord—He is
exalted—is continually present in his heart. So I knew he'll become good. I
looked at the second one and I saw he was the opposite. So I knew his final
outcome will be wicked. And f looked at the girl when she was still small and I
found that from old rags she was making ankle-rings, necklaces and bracelets,
and whatever women wear and adorn themselves with. She was always busy with
this. So I knew she'll end up with many worldly goods.”
I,
al-Lamati, would add that someone informed me that there was an orphan and his
mother put him to work in silk-making. He worked at it and it was very hard for
him. Then one day he passed by some people who were engaged in plaster-work and
sculpting and ornamenting plaster. He said- “I looked at them and my mind was
swept away by them. That day I abandoned silk-making and went to work with them.
My limbs performed the work rapidly and my heart felt enthusiasm. It was as if
I'd been in prison but now I'd come out. I possessed a great facility foe
understanding plaster-work and 1 never returned to silk-making.” And I should
add that today he's chief of the group occupied with the craft of plaster-work
and: '"Everyone is given help with what he was created for."
One of the people informed me that he once
owned a weak donkey and lived opposite a group in the desert. [He related:]
'Among them was a small orphan boy whose only concern was riding my donkey. But
he rode it the way one rides a horse. He put spurs made of thorns on his feet
and attached a bridle made of palm leaves to the donkey. In his hand he held a
lance made from sticks. And so he went on moving about on the donkey. As often
as we drove him away, he'd come back to the donkey if we weren't watching it.
When the child grew up and reached maturity, he returned with the stewards who
train the horse of the sultan—God give him victory- -and: "Everyone is
given help with what he was created for."
And
here let's relate the story about a teacher of boys who used to test them by
giving them birds. He ordered each of them (o slaughter bis bird in a place
where no one would see him. So they [all] went and slaughtered their birds,
except for one of the boys who was called Abul
Abbas Sabti—God
be pleased with him' He returned to the shaykh with his bird and said: 'In every
place where I warned to slaughter it, I found God with me/ The shaykh—God be
phased with him—men realized that he'd attain the station of divine knowledge.
He gave him counsel and didn't stop watching over him. But Cod the Sublime knows
best!
And
I heard the Shaykh say— God be pleased with him: 'If a man is innately
predisposed toward Friendship with God and God establishes him among people of
disobedience and he remains with them for a while, should one of the Friends of
God then pass before him end the man is with that disobedient group, (he
disposition in him for Friendship with God will come to life— through God's
permission—and he'll experience happiness, joy and the breast's expansion. And
this will happen solely because me Friend of God passed before them, even if (he
one innately predisposed toward Friendship with God didn't know him and the
Friend didn't speak to him and no words were exchanged between them- On the
other hand, if they do associate together and become acquainted with one
another, don't even ask about the coming to life of the man's innate disposition
and the increase of good within him during every moment. And if the man is
innately predisposed toward wickedness—toward theft for example—-and God
establishes him among people of Friendship with God and divine knowledge (‘irfan)
and he comes to serve them and consort with them for a while, and should a
thief, for instance, then pass before this group, the disposition for theft in
me man will come to life and his breast will rejoice in the wickedness within
him. And his experiencing such an upheaval will happen solely because the thief
passed before him, without his becoming acquainted with him and associating with
him. However, if they do become acquainted with one another, his wickedness will
then become complete—God protect us from this—-and: "Everyone is given
help with what be was created for."
I,
al-Lamati, would add that this is a broad subject and a useful path familiar to
whoever has taught religious knowledge and suchlike to the people. If these
words about capacity ace presented to him, he'll find they're like a transcribed
copy of what happened to him during the period of his teaching and his efforts.
Indeed, God the Sublime—He's endowed with generosity and
benevolence—established me in the station of teaching and 1 remained in it for
some twenty-seven years. When I heard what the Shaykh said—God be pleased with
him—about capacity and the spontaneous thoughts that bodies rely on, I
compared it with what happened to many people who studied with me and I found
what he said to be precise and universally applicable. Thanks to this I cast
from myself many burdens that I'd borne while I was teaching them.
They
were like a riding animal that goes on walking as long as you beat it. I'd gone
to extremes in giving them sincere advice and explaining by means of offering an
argument and proof. I'd wanted good for them and desired it for them so much
that it came to inhabit my body. All of this became my food and drink with them.
but if you atop beating it, it comes to a halt With many other people, however,
(be opposite happened, namely after they'd simply mixed and associated with me.
what they heard from me settled in their hearts. And they went on acquiring
increase in every session that they sat with me, despite my not making an
extreme effort with them the way I'd done with the other group.
I
continued to think about this and to seek the cause for it until I heard what
the Shaykh said—God be pleased with him— concerning capacity. I told him
what had happened to me with the first group and he said to me—God be pleased
with him: 'Cast the burden from yourself. You're striking cold iron. People are
given help with what they were created for and beginnings point to final
outcomes. So look at beginnings and accommodate people in their proper places.'
This is the sense of what he said-God be pleased with him—and from that day on
I felt relief. I acquired great knowledge—praise be to God—about people's
situations with regard to capacity in every matter. Praise be to God!
Now
if you're clever and smart, bright and intelligent, place these words before
your eyes, because thanks to them you'll rid yourself of many burdens when
associating with different categories of people, given the diversity of their
natures. But God alone confers success—He is sublime!
And
the said jurist asked him a question that's generally connected with this
subject. The wording of the text goes: 'Oh Sayyidi. another question is this:
What's the meaning of what Iblis’, the Cursed One said to the Friend of God
Sahl b, Abd Allah al-Tustari about
the verse of God the Sublime's word: "And My mercy embraces all things"
(Quran 7:156)?
Iblis
said to him; "Restriction (taqyid) is your characteristic, not God's
characteristic.” And the verse was a restrictive one and [yet] Iblis’ words
were in accordance with religious learning. What ploy is available to the slave
(‘abd) so as to restrict the word of God the Sublime, although the
verse is restrictive without his restriction, and despite the fact that the
shaykh who's a knower of God and a trainer of knowers of God, Muhyi
al-Din al-Hatimi,
says: "The Cursed One (Iblis) is the [spiritual] master of Sahl in this
regard and his teacher." Give an answer and be rewarded for it. Upon you be
the purest greeting and the best salutation!'
The
shaykh ('Abd al-Wahhab) al-Sha’rani d. (973/1565) —God the Sublime have
mercy on him—relates the story but remains silent about it. The questioner
imagined from his silence that the story was true. The difficulty in this lies
in postulating restriction on God's part—He is exalted—and not on the part
of Sahl. Thus he posed his question to the Shaykh—God be pleased with him!
The
Shaykh Sidi Abdellaziz Dabbagh answered-—God be pleased with him:
“The
restriction in the verse is on God's part—He is exalted—and not on the part
of people. Iblis’ adherence to the specious argument that be cites—God curse
him—is a false adherence. Correctness lies with Sahl—God be pleased with
him—not with Iblis—God curse him! The explanation of the praise for these
words which passed over his tongue-—God curse him—is that al-Hatimi
and Sahl understood by them something which Iblis didn't understand and which
didn't occur in his thought. In Sahl al-Tustari it aroused what was in repose
and awakened in him what was sleeping and concealed. He returned to beholding
what he knew from God—He is sublime and exalted! Indeed, after receiving
illumination and knowledge of God as He really is, if the Sufis—God be pleased
with them—look at the situation they were in before illumination, they find
that they'd been imposing restrictions on God in innumerable forms while being
unaware of it, and that they hadn't known God as He should rightly be known—He
is sublime and exalted! When the Cursed One said: "Restriction is your
characteristic, not God's characteristic”, these words caused Sahl’s
attention to focus on the two situations and he experienced what he experienced,
even though the Cursed One didn't intend the meaning Sahl’s attention focused
on, nor had it entered his thought. This is a particular form of hearing (sama’)
on the part of the Sufis—God be pleased with them!
A
shaykh came to the house of one of his disciples. He knocked at the door and
there was no one else in the house but the disciple. The disciple said:
"Who's knocking at the door? There's no one here but me." When the
shaykh heard his words: 'There's no one here but me", he was thunderstruck
and fell down unconscious. The disciple knew nothing of this. Whoever says the
disciple is the teacher of his shaykh in this sense isn't in any trouble.
And
a girl asked her father to bring her something from the market. The father wen:
out to get it and the mother said to her: "Why do you bother your
father?" The girl replied to her "Do I have anyone but him?" A
Sufi heard what she said and fell down unconscious. In this way the falsity of
Iblis’ words—God curse him—are made known, as well as the truth of sudden
insights of the Sufis and their allusions—God be pleased with them! But God
the Sublime knows best!'
And
the same jurist asked him a question not far from this subject, the text of
which is: 'And another question, oh Sayyidi, concerns what's transmitted from
one of the knowers of God, namely: "In disobedience there are a hundred
mercies which are accorded the believer.” What are these hundred mercies
whose origin is in God the Sublime's wrath and His justice? And what's the
secret of their being transformed into His mercy and His generosity?'
He
answered—God be pleased with him:
'What's
meant by this disobedience is the sin of the believer who's a knower of his
Lord's majesty and His awesomeness. Someone with this knowledge only commits the
sin in question due to the dominance of the divine decree. Nor do we mean in
particular the knower of God who's received illumination, but we mean one whose
faith is sincere and whose certainty is pure. Indeed, in such a case fear of his
Lord—He is blessed and exalted—doesn't abandon him even while he's obedient,
so how would it abandon him in a state of sin. The cause of fear settling in his
body is his knowledge of God's awesome power—He is sublime and exalted! So if
we suppose the persistence of this knowledge and the absence of its opposites in
the way of forgetfulness, etc., then fear persists and it settles in the body
and doesn't leave him, not even when he's in a state of obedience. Indeed, he's
afraid of performing acts of obedience in a way which distances him from God the
Sublime. You see him trembling in fear of this possibility so that be finds no
repose at all. He's overcome by this fear prior to acting, in the midst of
acting, and after acting. He continually anticipates what will befall him from
his Lord, fearing the awesomeness of divine lordliness and its power. Now if
this is the state he's in while being obedient, what's his state like if he's
committed a sin?
One
of the believers sinned against his Lord—He is mighty and glorious—and after
that disobedience he lived twenty-four years. Not one moment elapsed for him
during his long period without tears flowing from his eyes because of fear about
the disobedience. Thanks to the Messing of the tear arising from that
disobedience, God—He is blessed and exalted—protected him during so long a
period from committing sins and He rewarded him out of His generosity—He is
exalted—with awareness of the Knower of the Hidden during this long time. Due
to the disobedience the slave (‘abd) in question acquired innumerable
forms of mercies.
In
short, the matter revolves around fear which is permanently] settled in the body
and its cause is the continual knowledge of the power of divine lordliness. This
knowledge comes into the body from the spirit and the spirit is from the
Heavenly Assembly (the angels) who are the most knowledgeable beings in creation
about Lord—He is mighty and glorious! Thus if the body is pure and the spirit
provides it with some of its forms of knowledge, die slave (‘abd) will
profit in ail his states, both in his obedience and in his disobedience. If the
body isn't pure and the spirit veils its forms of knowledge from it, then the
body is given to lusts and inclined to pleasures, and this is what settles into
the body. The praiseworthy situation becomes in its view like sleep and what
prevails is what has settled in, for the command belongs to him who prevails.
Now his actions are in order to achieve his lusts. He pursues the goal of
benefiting the body and not what being God's slave (‘abd) requires in
order to fulfill the rightful claim of divine lordliness. He sins to fulfill his
pleasures, nor is it of any concern to him. Consequently, it's clear that the
matter doesn't revolve around obedience and disobedience but it revolves around
fear and its opposite. In reality, it revolves around knowledge and ignorance.
Moreover, the said number'—I mean the hundred mercies—isn't meant in a
precise sense. Rather the meaning is what we've indicated. But God the Sublime
knows best!'
The
above-mentioned jurist still bad two more questions. Let's present them here and
then we’ll be free to return to the [proper] subject.
The
same jurist said: 'One of the questions, oh Sayyidi, concerns the saying of the
knowers of God: "In everything I see I see God." But bow can
the eternal al-qadim) be seen in the contingent (al-‘hadith),
since God is elevated above residence [in a thing] and union [with it]? And then
there's their saying: "He is neither He Himself ('aynuhu) nor is He
other than Himself (ghayruhi)." But this entails doing away with
contradictions and that's impossible.'
He
answered—God be pleased with him:
'As
for the meaning of the first saying: "In everything I see I see God",
these are people who because of the power of their divine knowledge (‘irfan)—God
be pleased with them—behold His actions in fashioned things and created
beings. There's definitely no created thing that doesn't contain the actions of
God the Sublime- without His residence [in it] and without His union (with It].
And there are other secrets that shouldn't be divulged and shouldn't be told. In
short, the complete answer mustn't be recorded in a book. As for the second
saying, it's unclear. Indeed, the eternal is different from the contingent.
Moreover, what's different from something absolutely can't be the same as it,
but is dissimilar from it most certainly and without a doubt. Exact identity (‘ayniyya)
is eliminated, whereas being different (ghayriyya) is established. But
God alone confers success!”
[The
jurist then said:] 'And the following, oh Sayyidi, is another question: "When
the believer visualizes in his mind the form of the Prophet—God's
blessings and peace be upon him— (isti’hdar surat nabiy) and
represents it with a distinct identity, does it come from the world of the
spirit? Or does it come from the world of images? Or from the world of the
imagination? And is the person who experiences the mental form, as well as the
comprehensible conversation and discussion it includes, protected from Satan as
in the case of a vision in sleep, in accordance with the Prophet's words—God's
blessings and peace be upon him: "Whoever sees me [in a dream] really
sees me. for Satan is unable to take on my appearance."? Is it as the
Prophet says—blessings and peace be upon him—or is it not like this? Answer
and be rewarded for it! And upon you be the purest greeting and salutation!'
He
answered—God be pleased with him:
"This
visualization is from the person's spirit and his reason. Whoever turns his
thought to the Prophet—God's blessings and peace be upon him—the latter's
form occurs in his mind. If he's one of those who know the Prophet's noble form
because of being a Companion or one of the religious scholars who've made an
effort investigating it and then learned it, the form will occur in his thought
more or less the way it really Is outwardly. On the other hand, if he isn't one
of these two, he'll visualize him in a human form of extreme perfection in
physical constitution and character traits. Perhaps the form that's in his
thought will correspond to the externals or perhaps it will differ from them.
What's present in thought is the form of his body —God's blessings and peace
be upon him—not the form of his spirit— blessings and peace be upon him.
What the Companions beheld—God be pleased with them—and what the religious
scholars have reported about is the body, not the noble spirit. Thought is only
occupied with what a person understands and is familiar with.
As
for your words: "Does it come from the world of the spirit?", if by
this you mean the visualization, it's from the world of the spirit, that is to
say from the spirit of the person thinking' But if you mean by this what's
present, that is to say: Is what's present in our thoughts his spirit—God's
blessings and peace be upon him—?", it’s just been stated that this
isn't the case.
As
for the conversation and discussion, if this occurs to the person thinking, then
his body is pure and his spirit likes the body and doesn't veil its secrets from
it but is like a friend (khalil) is with his friend. Moreover, the
conversation is protected [against Satan] and true. If, however, the body is the
opposite of this, then the matter itself is the opposite. But God alone confers
success.” The Shaykh's answers come to an end here. God be pleased with him
and give us benefit through him—amen.
One
day I recounted for him—God be pleased with him—that a certain godly man (salih)
was performing the recollection of God (dhikr) with a group of his
companions. One of them suddenly underwent a change of complexion. His state was
altered and be changed the way he was sitting. They asked him: 'Why did you do
that?” He replied: “And know that the Apostle of God is among you” (Quran
49:7). He meant by this that the Prophet—Cod's blessings and peace be upon
him—was present with them at that moment and that he'd beheld this.
And
I asked the Shaykh—God be pleased with him:
“Is
this vision (mushahada) that the man experienced a vision of illumination
or a vision of thought?” He replied: 'A vision of thought (fikr), not a
vision of illumination (fat’h). But even if a vision of thought is
inferior to a vision of illumination, it's still only experienced by people of
pure faith (al-iman al-khalis), sincere love (mahabba safiya) and
truthful intention (niyya sadiqa). In
short, it's only experienced by someone whose attachment to the Prophet is
complete—God's blessings and peace be upon him! How many a person experiences
this vision and thinks it's a vision of illumination, whereas it's a vision of
thought! Yet if you compare this category of people who experience such a
vision—and they haven't received illumination—with the multitude of
believers, the multitude in this respect is as nothing and its faith compared
with their faith is like a non-entity. But God the Sublime knows best!"
I,
al-Lamati, would add that what confirms the mental vision and that it's
experienced by someone who hasn't received illumination is the fact that It's
experienced by someone whose love is perfected for a person, even if that person
isn't the Prophet God's blessings and peace be upon him!
A
butcher informed me that a son of his whom he loved very dearly died and the
son's person remained constantly in his thought His mind and fats limbs were
with him entirely. This was his usual state night and day. Finally, one day he
went out to the Bab al-Futuh, one of the gates of
Fez—God watch over the city— in order to buy sheep as is the wont of
butchers and his thought was preoccupied with the matter of his dead son. While
his thought was thus preoccupied, behold he saw him with his eyes. The son came
toward him and stood by his side. The butcher said: “I addressed him and I
told him: "Take hold of this sheep"—a sheep he'd bought—'"so
I can buy another one." A brief loss of consciousness had come over me.
When those who were nearby heard me speak with the boy, they asked: "Who
are you talking to?" When they spoke to me, I came back to my senses and
the boy disappeared from my sight. God alone knows what an emotion I felt in my
interior—He is blessed and exalted!”
I,
al-Lamati, would add that I heard the Shaykh say—God be pleased with him:
'Love
(mahabba)
like this must exist between the novice and the shaykh. It confers great
benefit.”
And
I heard him say:
'Those
who possess this love inflict harm and confer benefit, just as this occurs with
the people of the power of free
disposal
(Tasarruf). And he said: 'If the fire of love ignites, nothing can
withstand it'.
I heard him
say—God be pleased with him:
'A certain shaykh had a disciple and the disciple loved him dearly
so that the shaykh was never absent from his feelings and thoughts. If the
shaykh did something in his house, the disciple imitated it in his house. If the
shaykh, in his house, called out to his daughter: "Oh Fatima!", the
disciple called out: "Oh Fatima!" in his house. If the shaykh said:
"Do) this!", the disciple in his house said: "Do this!" And
if the shaykh began to wind his turban around his head, the disciple would take
hold of something and begin to wind it around his head. This is the way his
states were at all times in relation to the shaykh's state. Through love like
this that reaches such a degree [spiritual] inheritance (wirata)
occurs.'
I
heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“A
certain person was in love with a girl of beautiful appearance. His love for her
reached the stage where if someone shouted and called out her name: "Oh
Fatima", the lover would reply: "Yes!", without being aware of
it' He said—God be pleased with him: 'Relate this point from me, for I saw
it with my own eyes. If someone called out her name, he replied:
"Yes", and he was unaware of it. Now if such love occurs in humorous
circumstances, what must serious people be like [in this respect]!”
And
I heard him say—God be pleased with him:
(The
Qutb) Sayyidi Mansur (“Lahwaj”, d. 1129/1716 in Fez) used to say—God the
Sublime have mercy on him: "What happened to a certain Christian lad is
proof against anyone who lays claim to love of God the Sublime. The lad fell in
love with the daughter of one of their important men. When he'd met her and
slept with her in the same bed and his thought had been completely swept away in
oceans of love for her, she looked at his face and noticed a pimple on it. She
wanted to remove it She had a knife but it was poisoned, though she was unaware
of its poison- She removed the pimple and the poison spread through his body.
His spirit then departed while he was "absent" in his love of her. Now
this was an infidel- He reached the point in his satanic love that his spirit
departed without his being aware of it. So how must the state of believers be
with their Lord—He is mighty and glorious-?”
I
heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“A
devotee (muhibb) derives no benefit from a (spiritually) great person (kabir)
loving him, even if the great person is a prophet. The small person (saghir)
must love the great one and only then will be derive a benefit from the great
person's love. However, God the Sublime is the exception. If God—He is
exalted—loves the slave (‘abd), he'll benefit from His love, even if
the slave turns away completely.'
He
said—-God be pleased with him:
“If
a small person loves a great person, he attracts what's in the great person (kabir)
—but this doesn't happen the other way round. In front of the Shaykh was a
pear. He said: 'If God the Sublime provides this pear with love for a sour
apple; for example, and the love is very strong, the pear will absorb what's in
the apple. If we men split open the pear, we'll find the apple's sourness inside
it On the other hand, we won't find anything of the pear's flavor inside the
apple. But it's different with God the Sublime. If the slave (‘abd)
loves Him. He won't attract any of His secrets to himself unless God loves him.
The secret behind this difference is that God the Sublime doesn't love a slave
until He's caused him to know Hon- By means of that knowledge the slave becomes
aware of His secrets—He is exalted—and thus he experiences attraction to God
the Sublime. It's otherwise if the slave's love is without knowledge of his
Lord—He is mighty and glorious! In that case it doesn't accomplish anything.'
Then
I said: “They say the shaykh is with his disciple in the disciple's body and
that he resides there with him”.
He
replied—God be pleased with him:
"That's
true. And it's like this with the disciple because if his love is strong, he
attracts the shaykh so that he's as yon indicated and the disciple's body
becomes a place where the shaykh resides. And everyone adorns his place of
residence." Here he's alluding to the shaykh's influence on the disciple's
body when he resides in it.
“If
the disciple loves the shaykh with complete love (al-ma’habba al-kamila),
the shaykh resides with him in his body. The disciple is like a pregnant woman
who carries her child. Sometimes her foetus (‘haml) is entirely healthy
and remains in a proper condition until she gives birth. Other times the foetus
is lost and nothing comes of it. And other times it falls asleep and then
[eventually] wakes up. Its waking up varies. It may wake up after a month, it
may wake up after a year, or it may wake up later than that. So this is the
disciple's situation if he's pregnant with his shaykh. 1) Sometimes his love is
pure, complete and uninterrupted, and so the shaykhs affair appears in his body
until God confers illumination on him. 2) Other times his love is interrupted
after it had been sincere and the interruption is caused by the appearance of a
barrier—we beseech God for protection from this! Then his intention toward the
shaykh changes, and the shaykh's secrets are cut off from the disciple's body
after they'd been shining upon it. 3) Other times his love halts in its
progression for a short period or for one of middling length or for a long
period. Then the secrets of the shaykh” s body are held back from the
disciple's body. If the Jove returns, the secrets return.
So
let the disciple examine himself regarding which of these three categories he
belongs to. And let him beseech God the Sublime for forgiveness and well-being,
for success and for guidance. Indeed, He is all-hearing
and close at hand!” I would add that these are the categories found among the
disciples. So Jet the disciple be mindful of these words for they're precious
with respect to this subject. But God knows best!
And
I beard him say—God be pleased with him:
“The
disciple doesn't profit from loving his shaykh if he loves him for his secret (asrar)
or his Friendship with God (wilaya) or his religious learning (‘ilm)
or his generosity (karam) or tor any reasons such as these. Let the
disciple's love be attached and directed to the shaykh's person (dhat)
and not because of a cause and not because of a motive, but as is the love that
exists between youths. Indeed, they love one another without any motives that
incite love but simply out of affection alone. This is the love that must exist
between the disciple and the shaykh so the disciple's love doesn't fade into
ulterior motives and causes and causes. For when love does fade into such things,
Satan enters into it and introduces many doubts into it. Then sometimes it
ceases and other times it stops [progressing], as was previously discussed in
the last two categories. But God knows best!'
I asked him—God be pleased with him: 'Why
does love for the sake of religious learning (‘ilm), Friendship with
God, the secret, and things such as these, not bring benefit?'
He replied—God be pleased with him:
'Because
secrets, divine insights (ma’arif) and suchlike are all from
God the Sublime and everyone loves God the Sublime but up to this point has
still not loved his shaykh. Someone's love of his shaykh proves to be true if he
loves him exclusively for his person (dhatihi), not because of the
secrets he's achieved.'
Then I said: 'The person (dhat) of the
shaykh is likewise from God the Sublime. Everything is from Him. So why is there
benefit in love of one part but not another?'
He replied:
'That's
true. But by love of the person (dhat) we mean to express figuratively
that the love is purely for the sake of God the Sublime because no benefit or
anything else can be imagined from the person in itself. If love is directed
toward it, this is a sign of purity from flaws.'
And I said: 'People necessarily must have
motives and desires. Whoever tills land for the purpose of winter barley will
harvest the same. So he loves tilling for the sake of the barley, not for the
sake of tilling itself (li-dhatihi).'
He replied—God be pleased with him:
'Yes,
but if winter barley is his intention, though he pursues it to begin with, his
thought is then occupied with something else and it no longer remains on his
mind. This person acquires much barley and he achieves immense success. On the
other hand, if his thought is preoccupied with the barley day and night and he
starts thinking and calculating how much it will amount to and what he's going
to do with it if it grows, this person won't acquire any barley. Before he
acquires any barley, waswas (whispers from Iblis), will overcome him.
He'll go on asking himself: "Am I going to attain this barley? Perhaps
such-and-such a blight will strike it or the Banu So-and-so will plunder
it." By contrast, the first person's thought is at rest concerning the
matter of the barley and the matter of waswas. This is a description of
the person who loves the shaykh for his own sake
(li-dhatihi) and the person who loves him for some [other] reason.'
One
day I was talking with the Shaykh white we were in Jaza’ Ibn ‘Amir in the
protected city of Fez—God the Sublime watch over her—and he said to me:
'Sayyidi Mansur is at the head of the street. Would you like to meet him and
make his acquaintance?” I replied: 'Yes, oh Sayyidi, most willingly! How
would I not wish to meet the Qutb?” Then he said to me—God be pleased
with him:
“For
my part, even if I supposed your father and your mother had begotten a hundred
who resembled you in your form, your qualities and your religious learning and
in every characteristic of your person, inwardly and outwardly, I wouldn't
look at a single one of them. You're my allotment and my portion”
whereas they're like an [other] people in my view.”
I then woke from my negligence and was
roused from my sleep. I realized that what I brought forth was nothing. Surely,
love accepts no partnership. But God knows best!”
And
I heard him say—God be pleased with him: "What seeks the secret, on the
part of the disciple, is his earthen body (ad-dat at-turabiyya) and what
confers the secret, on the part of the shaykh, is his earthen body. If the
disciple's earthen body loves the earthen body of the shaykh with an exclusive
love, the shaykh's body will provide the disciple's body with its secrets and
its divine insights. And if the disciple's body loves the secrets of the
shaykh's body and love fades into its secrets and its divine insights, the
earthen body will impede it from what it seeks. Then neither the spirit nor
anything else will be able to do a thing for it. So let the disciple make the
utmost effort in loving the body (person) of his shaykh, avoiding benefit
absolutely. There's no strength and no power save in God, (he High and the
Mighty!”
And
I asked him—God be pleased with him—whether any indication and sign of
love exists.
He
replied'—God be pleased with him:
“There
are two indications. The first indication is that the disciple's repose
is in his shaykh's person and he only thinks about the latter, only acts for its
sake, only experiences rapture through it, only delights in it and is only sad
because of it, so that everything he does and omits to do, in secret and openly,
with presence and absence, is for the interests of the shaykh's person and
what's suitable for it He doesn't pay attention to his own person and its
interests. The second indication is polite behavior and reverence toward
his shaykh- Even supposing his shaykh is in a well and he's in a minaret, he'll
see with the eyes of his head that he's the one who's in the well and that the
shaykh is in the minaret. This is because reverence for the shaykh has so
overwhelmed his heart, indeed it's even overwhelmed his reason.”
And
he said—God be pleased with him:
“People
actually think the disciple is under obligation to the shaykh for a friendly
service. In reality, however, it's the disciple who renders friendly service to
the shaykh. Previously it was stated” that
love on the part of a great man confers no benefit but love on the disciple's
part exercises attraction. So if it weren't for the purity of the disciple's
body and the limpidity of his reason, his carnal soul's receptivity for good and
his love that exercises attraction, the shaykh wouldn't be able to do anything.
And if it were the shaykh's love that brought benefit, men everyone who received
his training would Succeed and attain what the (eminent! men have attained.'
And
I heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“An
indication that the disciple loves the shaykh with sincere, beneficial Jove is
the following. His love is able to bring about the disappearance of the secrets
and blessings in the shaykh's body so that the shaykh's body is stripped of all
that and becomes like the bodies of all ordinary people. If the love then
persists as it was, it's sincere love. But if the love shifts and fades with the
disappearance of the secrets, this is a false love. But God knows best!”
And
I heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“An
indication of pure love is that the scales the disciple uses [to assess] the
shaykh are abolished (suqut al-mizan) so that in the eyes of the
disciple the shaykh's actions, words, and every one of his states, have all been
rightly guided and had success conferred on them by God. As for what he's able
to understand, so much the better. As for what contains a secret he doesn't
understand, he consigns it to God the Sublime in the firm conviction that the
shaykh is right. But when he considers it possible that the shaykh isn't right,
inasmuch as it appears to him that the shaykh is doing something improper, then
he's fallen on his head and entered the company of the liars.”
He
said—God be pleased with him:
“The
shaykh doesn't demand any external service from his disciple, or that he consume
his worldly goods on his behalf, or anything in the way of physical works. But
he does make this one demand of him, that he believe the shaykh possesses
perfection, God-given success, divine knowledge, deeper vision and closeness to
God— He is mighty and glorious—and that he continue in this belief from one
day to the next, from one month to the next, and from one year to the next.
If that belief is present, the disciple will profit from it and profit from
everything he does for the shaykh in the way of service after that If this
belief isn't present or is present but doesn't persist waswas (whispers from Iblis) will
arise in him and the disciple won't amount to anything.”
And
I Was with him one day near the Bab al-Hadid, one of the gates of
Fez—God watch over the city—and a certain person was with us. He behaved
with much respect toward the Shaykh and was submissive whenever the occasion
presented itself such that none of the companions of the Shaykh—God be pleased
with him—could match him in this regard. Then the Shaykh—God be pleased with
him—said to him: 'Oh So-and-so, do you love me for the sake of God—He is
mighty and glorious—?” He replied: 'Yes, I do, oh Sayyidi, with a
sincere love for the noble face of God, devoid of concern for appearance and
reputation.” This made me jealous when I heard it The Shaykh said to him: 'But
do tell me, if you heard that I was [spiritualty] divested and the secrets that
are in my body disappeared, would you still love me?” He replied: 'Yes, I
would!” Then the Shaykh said: 'And if they told you I'd become a garbage
collector and a street-sweeper or something like that, would you still love me?
He replied: 'Yes, oh Sayyidi.' The Shaykh said: 'And if they told you I'd
become a sinner who commits offenses and doesn't care, would you continue to
love me?” He replied: 'Yes, I would!' The Shaykh said: 'And even if I
went on doing this for a year and then a year and then a year...?', and he
counted up to twenty years. The man replied: "Yes, and no doubt and no
hesitation would affect me.' At that I said to the man: 'Woe unto you! This is a
matter you won't be able to sustain.”
The
Shaykh then told him: 'I'm going to test you.' I said to
the man: 'Woe unto you! Here is the beginning of fear for your sake. How can the
blind sustain being tested by someone with sight? Seek pardon and forgiveness
from the Shaykh and admit to him your weakness and inadequacy. I'll support you
in this.” Then we all beseeched the Shaykh for forgiveness and pardon. But
what was foreordained was foreordained up to the point where he tested him with
something that contained his well-being but the reason for it wasn't apparent to
him and he couldn't support it. His intention toward the Shaykh—God be pleased
with him— then changed.”
I, al-Lamati, would add that only a
person whose clay (fakhar) is true can support a secret of God. He must be true
in resolve, effective in determination (sa’hih al-jazm) and keen in belief
(nafid al-azm). He listens to none of (God's) slaves (‘ibad) and has performed
the prayer for the dead over everyone but his shaykh.
Let's
write down some stories on this subject so that anyone who wishes good for
himself may draw a lesson from them. Before that, however, I intend to present
words I heard from the Shaykh—God be pleased with him—which will serve as an
introduction to the stories.
I
heard him say—God be pleased with him:
'Before
I received illumination I beheld a black, terrifying form that was very tall
with the appearance of a camel. This happened to me once. When I received
illumination and I beheld what was predestined for me from the worlds of my
Lord, I searched for the world of terrifying form and sought to know in what
place its kind was located. But I acquired no information about it I asked
Sayyidi Muhammad b. Abd al-Karim of Basra about this—God be pleased with
him—and he informed me that this kind of form didn't really exist I asked him:
"So what was it I beheld?' He replied: This is the action of the spirit—I
mean the spirit of your body.” “I asked him: "How is that?" He
replied: "If the body sets something before its eyes and is absolutely
certain of it the spirit assists the body in creating the form which it's
certain of and has begun to fear. The spirit assists the body in creating it
oven if there's some harm in it for the body."
He
said: 'There's nothing which stands up to the body's certainty
(jazm), whether on the side of good or on the side of
wickedness."
Sayyidi
Muhammad b. Abd al-Karim said: "Before I received illumination I passed
through a place and on the way a river appeared to me which only ships could
traverse. It was one of the rivers on the surface of the earth. I then felt an
immense certainty (jazm) in my body that I could walk on it and that I
wouldn't sink or suffer any harm." He said: "I placed my foot on the
surface of the water and my certainty (jazm) increased. I went on walking
on top of the water until I crossed to the other shore. When I came back on
another occasion, certainty (jazm) had disappeared from my body and I
began to have doubts about walking on it. I lowered my foot to test the water
but my foot sank in the water. I removed my foot and I knew I was unable to walk
on it.”"
The
Shaykh said—God be pleased with him:
'As
long as the body is absolutely certain (jaazima) about something, Satan
doesn't draw dose to it. But he draws close to it if certainty has left it.
And he knows when it's gone because he flows inside the blood of Adam's
offspring. So if he sees that it's left, he approaches the body with doubts so
that the body loses the good.”
He
said'—God be pleased with him:
“And
absolute certainty (al-jazm) is like the fortified wall of a city. When a
city has a wall, the enemy has no hopes concerning it. But when a breach occurs
in the wall, and gates and openings appear in it the enemy makes haste to enter.
The defect of Satan and his temptation is a consequence of the defect of the
body's wall which is absolute certainty. So let every intelligent person has
then to maintain the well-being of his body's wall so that Satan doesn't
approach him and no human being disturbs him.”
Another
time I heard him say in the same regard—God be pleased with him:
“If
someone truthful promises a person something to do with concerns in the
hereafter or the present world, and the person when he hears the promise is calm
and assured, being certain the promise is true, this is a sign that without a
doubt he'll attain the matter. If when he hears the promise he's disturbed and
has misgivings about the truth of the promise, this is a sign that he won't
attain the matter. Absolute certainty is the characteristic sign of the people
of truthfulness and actualization (ta’hqiq). We beseech God the Sublime
by His grace and His generosity to bestow on us His sweetness and His
secrets!”
But
now for the stories!
1)
One of them I heard from the Shaykh—God of pleased with him—is as follows;
'There
was a man who lived in earlier times whom God intended to show mercy (rahma),
and he loved the godly men. God put it in his heart to withdraw from his
property. Thus he sold the property collected the price, and set out with it to
see a person famous for his godliness. Groups from all regions came to visit the
person, and so this blessed man (marhum) went to him with all his money.
He travelled until he reached his town. Then he asked for his house and it was
shown to him. He knocked at the door and a [female] servant came out who said:
"What's your name?" He replied: “Abd al-‘Aliyy."
Now
the shaykh famous for Friendship with God was one of the sinners who spend
extravagantly (musrif) on themselves. He had a boon-companion who
accompanied him in wine-drinking and other things, and his name was Abd
al-‘Aliyy. So he had the same name as the blessed person. The servant girl
went off and said to the shaykh: The person who knocked at the door is named Abd
al-‘Aliyy." Thinking it was his boon-companion, he said: "Let him
in!"
The
man then entered before the shaykh and found the wine in front of him and a
dissolute woman with him. But God the Sublime bestowed on him disregard for all
this. He went up to the shaykh and said: "Oh Sayyidi. I heard about you in
my country. I've come to you so you may guide me to God—He is mighty and
glorious! This is my money. I've brought it to you for the sake of God the
Sublime." The shaykh said: "God accepts it from you." The shaykh
then ordered the servant girl to provide him with a flat-bread which the man
took. And the shaykh gave him a hoe and ordered him to work in a garden be owned
and that he assigned to bin. The blessed man straightway departed with a serene
carnal soul and a happy heart because the shaykh had accepted him. Off he went
rejoicing in the work. Though he felt tired from his journey to the shaykh, be
didn't rest [along the way] before he reached the garden. Then he set to work
with happiness, delight and eagerness of soul.
Due
to God's decree—He is mighty and glorious—and His friendliness toward (his
blessed man, his arrival before the shaykh who was an impostor and an
extravagant spender coincided with the death of one of the great knowers of God.
The latter was also one of the members of the Diwan, and the Ghawt
as well as the seven
Pivots
were present at his death. They said to him: "Oh Sayyidi So-and-so, how
many times we told you: 'Descend to one of the cities of Islam! Then maybe
you'll meet someone to inherit your secret from you.' But you didn't listen to
us. Now the hour of your death has arrived and your secret will be lost and
you'll be left without an heir." He replied to them: "Oh my lords,
even while I remained in my place, God the Sublime has sent me the person who
will inherit from me." They asked him: "Who is he?" He replied:
"Abd al-‘Aliyy”. who's gone to visit So-and-so the impostor. Just look
at his purity of heart with God— He is mighty and glorious—and at his
perfect sincerity, firmness of mind, effective resolve, and his deep-rooted
certainty. He saw what he saw but his thought wasn't shaken and no doubts were
aroused in him. Have you ever heard of a purity such as his body contains? So do
you agree to his inheriting [from me)?" They replied: "Yes, we
do!"
The
spirit then departed from the Friend of God and Abd al-‘Aliyy was united with
the secret. God—He is mighty and glorious—rewarded him for his good
intention. He then experienced illumination. He realized where the mercy had
come from and that the shaykh he'd journeyed to was given to extravagance and an
impostor and that God the Sublime had shown him mercy solely because of his
intention. But God alone confers success!'
2)
And another one I heard from the Shaykh—God be pleased with him—is:
There
was a shaykh who had a sincere disciple and one day the shaykh wished to test
his sincerity. He said to him: "Oh So-and-so. do you love me?" He
replied: "Yes I do, oh Sayyidi." He said to him: "Whom do you
love more, me or your father?" He replied: "You, oh Sayyidi" Then
be said: "Let's see now! If I ordered you to bring me your father's
head, would you obey me?" He replied: "Oh Sayyidi, how would I not
obey you? But you shall see presently." And he immediately departed. This
occurred after people had gone to sleep. So he scaled the wall of his family's
house and ascended to the roof. Then he entered the apartment of his father and
mother. He found his father having intercourse with his mother. He left him no
time to satisfy his desire but kneeled on his father—who was on top of his
mother—and cut off his head. He brought the head to the shaykh and cast it
down before him.
The
shaykh exclaimed: "Woe unto you! You've brought me the head of your
father!" He replied: "Yes, oh Sayyidi! Isn't this it?" The shaykh
said: "Woe unto you! I was only joking." The disciple said to him:
"As far as I'm concerned, none of your words contain any jesting."
Then the shaykh—God be pleased with him—said to him: "Look! Is this the
head of your father?" The disciple looked and behold, it wasn't his
father's head. The shaykh said to him: "Whose head is it?" He replied
to him: "The head of So-and-so the (Christian) renegade ('ilj)."'
The
Shaykh (may Allah be pleased with him) said: 'The people of their city were
making use of many renegades like slaves from the Sudan.' He said: 'His father
was absent that night and his wife betrayed him in bed. She had a rendez-vous
with a (Christian) renegade and she gave herself to him. This was unveiled to
the shaykh— God be pleased with him—and be sent his disciple to kill him as
described in order to test his sincerity. He came to realize the disciple was
a mountain among mountains. He became the heir to the shaykh's secret and
took charge of his illumination after him. But God alone confers success!'
3)
And another that f heard him relate—God be pleased with him—is:
'A
disciple came to a shaykh who was a knower of God and said to him: "Oh
Sayyidi, acceptance rests with God—He is mighty and glorious!" He
replied: "Yes, it does." And he ordered the disciple to reside with
him and to devote himself to serving him. He gave him a hoe that had a ball of
iron added on the end of it which had no benefit but made the hoe heavier. And
the disciple was to be the heir of the shaykh on condition that he paid no
attention to the said iron ball. If he did pay attention to it and remarked:
"What's the use of this? What good does it serve? The only thing it does is
add weight"—then he wouldn't inherit anything from him.” He said—God
be pleased with him: 'So he went on serving him for seven years and he worked
with the hoe. Meanwhile, not one vein of doubt stirred in him, nor did storms of
Satan’s winds sway him. The said ball became like non-existence which is
neither seen nor heard. And this is the situation of the sincere on whom God has
conferred success.'
4)
And I heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“There
was a knower of God—He is mighty and glorious—who had a sincere disciple and
he was the heir to his secret. God the Sublime then made him witness many
shocking things on the part of his shaykh. Despite this, no doubt arose in the
disciple. When his shaykh died and God bestowed illumination on the disciple, he
beheld these things [the way they were] and understood that the shaykh had
behaved correctly regarding them. They contained nothing that the law condemns.
They'd only appeared to him to be doubtful (ishtabahat ‘alayh).
One
of these was that there was a woman among the shaykh's neighbors who was known
for wickedness. The disciple knew her personally. And the shaykh had a wife who
looked like her but the disciple wasn't acquainted with the wife. Now the shaykh
had a place where he practiced spiritual retreat between the entrance of the
house and the rooms. The disciple wouldn't go into it but would stop in the
entrance. It happened that the woman known for wickedness entered before the
disciple while he was in the entrance and then she passed through the house.
It
also happened that the shaykh’s wife who looked like her came forth and
entered unto the shaykh in his retreat. The shaykh had sent for her to satisfy
his natural desire with her. So she entered and the shaykh went to her.
Meanwhile, the woman who looked like her passed on to the rooms. The disciple
cast a glance at the retreat and he saw the wife with the shaykh and the shaykh
was having his way with her. The disciple was sure she was the woman known for
wickedness. But God kept his heart tranquil and Satan didn't upset him.
Then
the wife came out and it was the time for prayers. The shaykh came forth for the
prayers and performed his ablutions with sand (tayammum). He had a
disorder which prevented him from performing a major ritual ablution [with
water]. The disciple” however, was sure the shaykh performed his ablutions
with sand without an injury. But God kept the disciple's heart tranquil.
Likewise,
the shaykh suffered from a disorder that hindered him from digesting food so
that they prepared juice for him by squeezing a melon and brought him the juice
to drink. The disciple came in and found him drinking it He was sure it was
wine. But God kept his heart tranquil and no doubt arose in him.
When
God then bestowed illumination on him, be understood that the woman the shaykh
had intercourse with was his wife, not the woman known for wickedness. And he
understood that the shaykh’s performing his ablutions with sand was because of
the injury to his body. And he understood that the liquid the shaykh drank was
melon juke, not wine. But God alone confers success!'
5) And I heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“A
disciple had a brother in God—He is mighty and glorious! This brother died and
the disciple remained. And if God bestowed anything on him, he'd divide it
between his children and the children of his brother in God. The disciple owned
a piece of land along with his [real] brothers. It was unjustly sold off by the
Makhzan and when they received the price for it, the disciple's share came to
forty mithqals in today's coin.
His
brothers said to him: "What are you going to do with your money?" He
replied: To going to divide it between myself and the
children of my brother in God." They thought he was a fool and said:
"We've never met anyone with your lack of intelligence! Make use of your
money. Buy this with it and do that with it. Abandon this stupidity you're
engaged in."
His carnal soul wanted to incline toward what they said but he told
it: "Oh my carnal soul, what will you say to God—He is mighty and
glorious—if you're standing before Him tomorrow and He says to me: 'I bestowed
on you forty mithqals and you appropriated them for yourself and caused
the rightful claim of brotherhood to perish. So today I shall let you perish the
way you caused it to perish.'"
God conferred success on him. He divided the money between himself
and the children of his brother in God. When he left them, God bestowed
illumination on him and gave him what no eye has seen, no ear has heard, and
what has never occurred in any human being's heart. God made him one of the
knowers of God because of his purity of intention, the fidelity of his
resolution, and the effectiveness of his certainty. But God alone confers
success!'
6) And I heard from someone other than the Shaykh—God be pleased with him:
'A great man had a number of disciples (ashab) and he suspected that only one of them possessed excellence. One day he wanted to put them to the test and test them he did. Everyone of them then fled, except that one individual. What happened is that he neglected them so they gathered at the door of his retreat (khalwa). Then he made appear to them the form of a woman who came to him and entered his retreat. The shaykh stood up and went inside with her. They were sure the shaykh was engaged in immoral behavior with her. Thus they all dispersed and their intention was lost, except that one person. He went off and, having fetched some water, he started to heat it so the shaykh could perform his ritual ablutions with it.
Then the shaykh
came out and said: "What's this you're doing?" He replied: "I saw
the woman go inside and I thought perhaps you need to perform a major ritual
ablution. So I've heated the water for you." The shaykh said to him:
"You still follow me after you saw me commit a sin?" He replied:
"Why wouldn't I follow you? Sin isn't an impossibility in your case. It's
only an impossibility where prophets are concerned—blessings and peace be upon
them! I haven't associated with you because you're a prophet and commit no sins.
I've associated with you because you're a human being and you're more
knowledgeable
7)
And I saw in the book of Muhyi al-Din, the student of Taj al-Din al-Dhakir
al-Misri (d. 920/1514)”—God have mercy on him—
“Someone
went to one of the great men and said to him: 'Oh Sayyidi, I want you to bestow
on me the secret that God has distinguished you with.' The shaykh replied: 'But
you won't be able to support it.' The disciple said: “J can support it and I
have the capacity for it.” So the shaykh tested him with something that caused
him to roll on his head. We beseech God for protection from this!
What
happened is there was a youth staying with the shaykh, whose father was an
eminent man. When that disciple said: 'I can support the secret, the shaykh said
to him: 'I'll bestow on you the secret—if God is willing, and he ordered him
to reside with him. Then the shaykh ordered the youth to hide somewhere so that
no one would see him. The shaykh then had a ram brought to his retreat and
slaughtered it He placed some of the blood on his clothes and, carrying a knife
in his hand, he went to the said disciple. Blood was dripping from his hand and
he appeared to be in a rage. The disciple said: 'What's happened to you, oh
Sayyidi?' He replied: "The youth So-and-so provoked my anger. My carnal
soul lost control and has slaughtered him. He lies slaughtered in that place.'
And he pointed to the retreat where he'd slaughtered the ram 'if you want the
secret, my son, conceal this matter and don't mention it to anyone. If his
father asks me about him, I'll tell him: "Your son fell ill and has
died." He'll believe me and the matter will turn out favorably. So perhaps,
my son, you'll help me and protect me in this affair. Should you do so, I'll
bestow the secret on you—if God the Sublime is willing!'
Thinking
that now the shaykh was in his grip, the disciple's face changed and his wrath
was visible. But he said: 'I'll do it”, though the falsity of his words was
evident. He then left (be shaykh and quickly went to the young man's father. He
informed him of the story and said to him: The false shaykh we believed had good
hi him has just killed your son. He was encouraging me to cover it up and asked
me to conceal it from you. If you're in doubt about the matter, come with me
immediately. You'll find your son wallowing in his blood.' At that the people
exclaimed: 'Woe unto you! Sayyidi So-and-so would never do this, Perhaps this is
only how it appears to you.” But he said to them: 'Come with me and my
truthfulness or my falsity will be revealed.”
What
he said spread among the people and the government authorities heard it So with
the disciple in the lead they hurried along their way to die shaykh until they
came to a halt before the shaykh" s retreat. They knocked at the door and
the shaykh emerged. He asked them: 'What is it you want? What brings you here?
They replied to him: 'Haven't you heard what this person is saying?', and they
pointed to the disciple. The shaykh asked him: 'What's happened?” The disciple
replied: 'What you urged me and asked me to conceal, that's what's happened!'
The shaykh said: 'Nothing has occurred between me and you. I've never spoken to
you.' The disciple replied: 'Lying won't save you! You've killed someone's son.'
And the people rushed toward the shaykh from every aide, [exclaiming;] 'You've
killed someone's son and now we're going to kill you, oh enemy of God! You who
dupe the people with your worship and deceive them with your spiritual retreat (khalwa).
The
shaykh said: 'Ask him how he knows 1 killed him.' The disciple replied: 'Didn't
you come out to me with traces of blood on your hands and clothes?” The shaykh
said: 'Yes. I'd slaughtered a sheep.' The disciple said: 'Then let's go into the
retreat, if you're telling the truth.” So they went inside and found the
slaughtered sheep. The disciple said: 'You've hidden the murdered person's body.
You've pot this sheep in its place so as not to be killed because of it.' The
shaykh said: 'But let's see! If the young man comes out with no harm to him,
will you know you're among the liars who shall not prosper?' The disciple said:
'Bring him out, if you're telling the truth.” The shaykh sent for the youth.
He came forth and was unaware of what had happened. When the people saw him,
they implored the shaykh (for forgiveness] and to curse the false disciple.
Thereupon
the shaykh said to him: 'Oh liar, didn't you claim you could sustain the secret
and had the capacity for it? So why couldn't you conceal this matter of no
importance? But we did this to you because you claimed you could support the
secret. Be gone! We've bestowed on you the secret that's appropriate for your
kind.” From that day forward this disciple was a warning for those who can
learn a lesson, and a severe reprimand for those with false claims. We beseech
God for success through His grace!
8)
A wondrous story took place involving another man.
He
was the chief (shaykh) of a travelling party of pilgrims and was from the
Maghrib. He was especially interested in meeting godly men. He loved them and
was searching for someone at whose hands he might profit. This was his usual
practice when he went out to the East and when he returned to the West. Then he
met a (Khalwati)
godly man in Egypt who entrusted him with a deposit and told him: The man who
asks you tor this is your master (sahib).' Thus he went on making the
rounds among the godly men he knew, one by one, until he came back to his home
town (Fez, Morocco). He entered his house and remained there for a certain time.
Then one day his neighbor (i.e. Sidi Abul Mahasin Yusuf al-Fasi, d. 1013/1598)
met him and said to him: 'Where's the deposit So-and-so gave you in Egypt?” He
then realized that his neighbor was the Lord of Time (Sahib al-Waqt). He
fell at his feet and, kissing them, he exclaimed: 'Oh Sayyidi, how have you
hidden yourself from me? Without neglect I've gone to every godly man who was
pointed out in the East and the West Yet you're my own neighbor and the closest
of people to me.'
Then
he asked him for the secret God had distinguished him with. Bui the shaykh told
him: This is something you can't support. He replied: 'But I can support it, oh
Sayyidi'.' And the shaykh said: 'If you can support it, act in accordance with
the condition I set' He asked: 'What's your condition, oh Sayyidi?” The shaykh
replied: 'It's a condition entailing no great loss for you, namely that you
shave this long beard of yours.” He said to him: 'Oh Sayyidi. How is this
possible for me? Along the road to the East I'm respected and revered because of
my beard.' 'If you want the secret”, said the shaykh, 'do what I've told you.'
He replied to him: 'Oh Sayyidi, this is something I can't support” The shaykh
said to him: Then you're left having committed no offense against me, since you
didn't accept my condition.” And so he left him. When the shaykh died and the
man had missed what he missed, he felt remorse and said: “If in the time of
the shaykh I'd possessed the intelligence I possess today, I'd have done what he
said and even more.”'
9)
And I heard a trustworthy person relate the following,” and he was someone
who used to see the Prophet—God's blessings and peace be upon him—in a
waking state and smell the scent of the Prophet's city—God's blessings and
peace be upon him— while in the dry of Fez:
“I
was with a Friend of God on Friday in the al-Andalus Mosque in the protected city
of Fez—God watch over it—and when I'd performed the Friday prayers and come
out of the mosque, suddenly a man appeared who kissed the hand of that Friend of
God. He said: "Oh Sayyidi. I love yon for the sake of God—He is mighty
and glorious!" Glancing at him with a disapproving look, the Friend of God
replied to him: "Don't you realize that God knows whatever is secret and
has kept it hidden?" That is to say, isn't God's knowledge [of something]
and His good reward for it enough for you? The Friend of God then departed.
The
person who claimed to love [him] wept because of what be heard from the Friend.
I went up to him and said: "Oh you there, what you've claimed is an awesome
matter and the shaykh must necessarily test you. Be a man! Otherwise this will
be the cause of separation between you and the shaykh."“
The
trustworthy person continued: "He was a neighbor to the shaykh in one of
(he shaykh's gardens and the shaykh possessed a fig-tree within the garden's
boundaries. The man with the claim of love used to collect its fruit every year.
The shaykh was forbearing. He pardoned and forgave him, and was a good neighbor.
But when the man claimed to love him, the shaykh abandoned putting up with this
bother and said to him: The tree is my tree. Nothing of it belongs to you!"
The one who claimed (to love him] disagreed with him and said: "It belongs
to me!" Now the shaykh entered into serious strife and enmity with him,
such that I heard the claimer cursing at the shaykh—God be pleased with him!'
And
I, al-Lamati, heard this [trustworthy] man say: 'We went on the pilgrimage and
when I visited the Prophet's grave—God's blessings and peace be upon him—a
state came over me. I said: "Oh Apostle of God, I hadn't thought I'd come
to your city and then go back to Fez." From the direction of the noble
grave I heard a voice say: "If I'm held within this grave, let whoever
comes from among you remain here. But if I'm with my religious community
wherever they may be, go back to your country."' He said: 'I went back
to my country.' God the Sublime confers success.'
10)
And I heard the Shaykh say—God be pleased with him:
“One
of the shaykhs drawn unto God (al-majdhub) displayed bad conduct and the
people fled from him. One day he even poured wine on his clothes. The people
smelled the scent of wine coming from him and they fled from him. Only the heir
to his secret stayed with him. The shaykh in question said: "I did this on
purpose so these ants would flee from me"—he was referring to the
multitude of people who were following him, "I have no need of them. There
is need only for you!" God alone confers success.''
11)
And I heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“A
man came to one of the Friends of God and began to contemplate him. He let his
gaze pass over him until he'd contemplated him from head to foot The Friend of
God said to him; "What is it you want?" He replied: "Oh Sayyidi,
this is my booty. I want my body to look at your body so that tomorrow it will
intercede for my body before God." “The Shaykh said—God be pleased with
him: 'That man gained great profit?”
When
he recounted this story—God be pleased with him—he used to say: 'There
are still people left in this religious community. Praise be to God?” God
alone confers success!
12)
And I heard him say—God be pleased with him:
“A person of sincerity came to someone he believed had goodness in him and he said to him: "Verily, I love you in God—He is mighty and glorious!" The shaykh replied to turn—and this was the time of the morning prayers: "If you wish to profit, don't ever go back to your house. Go to the East." “The Shaykh said: 'He obeyed and didn't contradict him. And so he gained this world and the world to come. God alone confers success!”
Quest for the Contemporary Sufi Guide: Challenges, Veils and Limitation of Sufi Books
On the Living Saints (al-Awliya al-A'hya') and Masters of the Age (As'hab al-Waqt) and Saints of Disposal and Special Authority...[More]
Clearing the Confusion between the Difference of the 'Shaykh' and the 'Muqaddam'
Tijani scholars have agreed about the thorough identity of the teacher of the Tijani litany. The Allama Shaykh Sidi Ahmed Skirej...[More]

